WEUP Connector logoConnectorConnectivity Solutions
Open navigation
Equivalent connector review

Automotive connector cross reference

Submit an OEM part number, competitor model, drawing, datasheet or sample photo. The review path helps compare connector structure, terminal matching, seal design, electrical requirements and application risk before quotation.

Important note

Cross reference is an engineering review process. Equivalent selection should be confirmed by drawings, samples, specifications and application testing before production use.

Start review

Enter a reference model for equivalent connector RFQ

This starter helps route TE, Molex, Aptiv, Yazaki, Sumitomo, Amphenol or OEM model references into the correct RFQ path.

Start RFQ Review

Enter a brand, model or reference part number. The RFQ will be routed as an equivalent connector review and should include photos, drawings, pin count, wire size and application.

Brand reference library

Common equivalent connector reference sources

These brand references are handled as review paths, not automatic one-to-one replacements.

TE / AMP

cavity layout, latch, terminal family, seal, wire range and mating part

TE part numberAMP part numberhousing photo
Open Route

Molex

pin count, pitch, latch direction, current rating and harness compatibility

Molex seriespart numberdatasheet
Open Route

Aptiv / Delphi

sealed housing, terminal series, CPA/TPA lock and IP requirement

Delphi/Aptiv modelsealed connector photowire size
Open Route

Yazaki / Sumitomo

harness fit, keying, terminal retention, mating connector and production sample

OEM harness referencevehicle systemconnector sample
Open Route

Amphenol / HV connector

high-voltage safety, HVIL, cable sealing, current path and validation risk

HV connector photovoltage/currentcable size
Open Route

Review process

How equivalent connector review works

A reliable cross reference path checks structure and application fit, not only product appearance.

01

Submit Reference

Send OEM part number, competitor model, drawing, photo or physical sample.

02

Compare Specification

Review pin count, cavity layout, terminal, seal, material and electrical requirement.

03

Confirm Risk

Check fit, locking structure, waterproof level, current rating and application environment.

04

Request Quote

Prepare recommended connector path, sample plan and quotation requirement.

Replacement risk control

Equivalent review is not only visual matching

Automotive connector alternatives must be checked against mechanical, electrical, sealing and application requirements before production use.

Same appearance does not guarantee same terminal, seal, material or current rating.

Connector replacement must confirm mating direction, latch, keying, wire range and crimp condition.

Waterproof alternatives must be reviewed with seal size, wire outer diameter and IP test condition.

EV and high-voltage alternatives need safety, cable size, HVIL and validation review before quotation.

Final use should be confirmed by sample fit, drawing check and application testing.

Reference examples

Common cross reference request paths

These examples show how brand or model references can be routed into connector families and RFQ requirements.

TE / AMP equivalent

housing, terminal, seal and drawing comparison

Automotive Connectors / Wire Harness Connectors

part number, photo, datasheet or sample

Molex equivalent

cavity layout, latch direction, terminal and current review

Automotive Connectors / Terminals

model number, pin count and application

Aptiv / Delphi equivalent

sealed housing, terminal series and harness compatibility

Waterproof Connectors / Wire Harness Connectors

connector photo, wire size and IP requirement

Amphenol / EV connector equivalent

high-voltage safety, current, IP rating and cable size review

EV Connectors / High Voltage Connectors

voltage, current, drawing and project stage

RFQ preparation

Information needed for cross reference review

Complete reference information helps reduce wrong matches and makes the quotation review faster.

Original part number or brand reference

Product photo, drawing, datasheet or physical sample

Pin count, wire size, voltage, current and IP rating

Vehicle system, application environment and annual demand

Need for housing, terminal, seal, plug, socket or full connector kit

FAQ

Cross reference questions

Equivalent connector review should be handled carefully because appearance alone is not enough for automotive applications.

Can you provide an exact replacement for TE, Molex or Aptiv connectors?

Cross reference is an engineering review process. Equivalent selection should be confirmed by part number, drawing, sample, terminal, seal, electrical requirement and application testing.

What information is needed for connector cross reference review?

Provide original part number, photos, drawing or datasheet, pin count, wire size, voltage, current, IP rating, application and quantity requirement.

Need equivalent connector review?

Send the reference model, photo, drawing or sample information. The RFQ path will collect the details needed for engineering review.

Submit Cross Reference RFQ